[email protected] Mr. Fu Chen Lin

Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:02:03 -0700
Received: from zim2.mesacc.edu ([140.198.64.8])
by (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1OjGYs-0001us-Gf
for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:02:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by zim2.mesacc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856DF16554E3;
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:21:55 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zim2.mesacc.edu
Received: from zim2.mesacc.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (zim2.mesacc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id U9nQmshiG+UC; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:21:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from zimbra.mesacc.edu (zimbra.mesacc.edu [140.198.64.7])
by zim2.mesacc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7C116552C9;
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:18:08 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by zimbra.mesacc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F63415684C0;
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:18:08 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mesacc.edu
Received: from zimbra.mesacc.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (zimbra.mesacc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 15i4MiQBe7ul; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:18:07 -0700 (MST)
Received: from User (a113070.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.113.70])
by zimbra.mesacc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D545B15684EC;
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:17:57 -0700 (MST)
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
From: "Fu Chen Lin"<[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:25:10 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=15.2
X-Spam-Score: 152
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: From Mr. Fu Chen Lin Email: [email protected] Bank of China
[...]
Content analysis details: (15.2 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.5 DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN RBL: Envelope sender in dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
2.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?62.163.113.70>]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
2.2 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received: date
0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN)
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.5 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format
0.8 MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE
0.0 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only
3.1 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Business Proposal

From Mr. Fu Chen Lin
Email: [email protected]
Bank of China
http://www.bochk.com
Country: Hong Kong.
Fax: +852-301-64352

I am writing you about a customer that came to engage in Private Banking services : The customer had a financial portfolio of $19,500,000.00 and this I help turned over in the purchase of securities in the capital
markets. Since the original owner listed no next of kin in his bio-data form, my proposition is this, I am prepared to place you in a position to instruct my Bank to release the deposit to you as the closest
survivingrelation.

If you find yourself able to work with me, contact me through this email account: [email protected] If you give me positive signals, I will initiate this process towards
conclusion.

Regards,
Fu Chen Lin