#391076 by buried under 419s
Mon Jul 08, 2019 9:39 pm
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To:
Received: from
by with LMTP id kORpJmnmI12gNwAAjbubUg
for <>; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:57:13 -0700
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:57:13 -0700
Received: from smtp2.ennit.net ([82.97.146.110]:33554)
by with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1hkeRQ-0003hO-3l
for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:57:13 -0700
Received: from relay2.ennit.net (relay2.ennit.net [82.97.146.99])
by smtp2.ennit.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9911058B0
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp2-1.tng.de (smtp2-1.tng.de [213.178.66.95])
by relay2.ennit.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 019BE1006EB
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.tng.de (proxy01.mailcluster.tng.de [82.97.146.171])
by smtp2-1.tng.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B8A1FFE2
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tng.de (114-192-70-217.static.dsl.core.tng.de [217.70.192.114])
by smtp.tng.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D021913F116
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:24 +0200 (CEST)
Reply-To: [email protected]
From: "JOHNSON KINK"<[email protected]>
To:
Date: 09 Jul 2019 02:49:32 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.7
X-Spam-Score: 127
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.
Content preview: Attn: It is understandable if you are apprehensive reading
from me today since there was no previous communication between us.However,
I implore your attention on the herewith contained subject matter which benefits
our interest. I came across your contact via scrupulous search conducted
by an IT specialist whom I have employed for the purpose of same. [...]
Content analysis details: (12.7 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.0 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit
(jklaw08[at]outlook.com)
0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
3.1 MONEY_FRAUD_8 Lots of money and very many fraud phrases
1.2 ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW_MONEY Advance Fee fraud and lots of money
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Pertinent information
Attn:
It is understandable if you are apprehensive reading from me today since there was
no previous communication between us.However, I implore your attention on the
herewith contained subject matter which benefits our interest. I came across your
contact via scrupulous search conducted by an IT specialist whom I have employed for
the purpose of same.
I am Johnson King (Mr) and I promote this communication in my capacity as the
principal attorney of my law firm. A deceased client Henry died in 2010, left a sum
a little above US$ 28 million in his account here in Unity Bank Plc. Normally
banking procedure requires the bank to declare the account forfeitable and to
transfer the proceeds to the Registry of Unclaimed Property for government use after
8 years from the time of death of the deceased.
The present situation underscores my contacting you given that you and my deceased
client share the same name and nationality. I am disposed to present you as the
beneficiary and administrator of the account. It may also interest you to know that
the transaction will be executed within the parameter of the law; nothing will be
done outside of it.If you are not familiar with estate and probate measures, I shall
promote further information to you concerning these in the future. Whereas, I am
proposing a mutual sharing of the estate and a charity donation in part, we will
discuss the ratios succinctly and promote them in written signed agreement before
commencement.
The decision concerning charity organizations to make donation can be discussed in
good faith when we meet. I wish to submit that I would expect nothing less but
honesty and transparency. I will uncover to you further information on the matter in
our following communications. If this matter interests you, kindly revert
accordingly with your direct phone number for further exhaustive dialogue.
Thank you for your time as I am looking forward for your business relationship.
Kind Regards
Johnson King & Co. (Brr)
ATTORNEY AT-LAW
Delivered-To:
Received: from
by with LMTP id kORpJmnmI12gNwAAjbubUg
for <>; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:57:13 -0700
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:57:13 -0700
Received: from smtp2.ennit.net ([82.97.146.110]:33554)
by with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1hkeRQ-0003hO-3l
for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:57:13 -0700
Received: from relay2.ennit.net (relay2.ennit.net [82.97.146.99])
by smtp2.ennit.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9911058B0
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp2-1.tng.de (smtp2-1.tng.de [213.178.66.95])
by relay2.ennit.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 019BE1006EB
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.tng.de (proxy01.mailcluster.tng.de [82.97.146.171])
by smtp2-1.tng.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B8A1FFE2
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tng.de (114-192-70-217.static.dsl.core.tng.de [217.70.192.114])
by smtp.tng.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D021913F116
for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 02:56:24 +0200 (CEST)
Reply-To: [email protected]
From: "JOHNSON KINK"<[email protected]>
To:
Date: 09 Jul 2019 02:49:32 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.7
X-Spam-Score: 127
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.
Content preview: Attn: It is understandable if you are apprehensive reading
from me today since there was no previous communication between us.However,
I implore your attention on the herewith contained subject matter which benefits
our interest. I came across your contact via scrupulous search conducted
by an IT specialist whom I have employed for the purpose of same. [...]
Content analysis details: (12.7 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.0 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit
(jklaw08[at]outlook.com)
0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
3.1 MONEY_FRAUD_8 Lots of money and very many fraud phrases
1.2 ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW_MONEY Advance Fee fraud and lots of money
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Pertinent information
Attn:
It is understandable if you are apprehensive reading from me today since there was
no previous communication between us.However, I implore your attention on the
herewith contained subject matter which benefits our interest. I came across your
contact via scrupulous search conducted by an IT specialist whom I have employed for
the purpose of same.
I am Johnson King (Mr) and I promote this communication in my capacity as the
principal attorney of my law firm. A deceased client Henry died in 2010, left a sum
a little above US$ 28 million in his account here in Unity Bank Plc. Normally
banking procedure requires the bank to declare the account forfeitable and to
transfer the proceeds to the Registry of Unclaimed Property for government use after
8 years from the time of death of the deceased.
The present situation underscores my contacting you given that you and my deceased
client share the same name and nationality. I am disposed to present you as the
beneficiary and administrator of the account. It may also interest you to know that
the transaction will be executed within the parameter of the law; nothing will be
done outside of it.If you are not familiar with estate and probate measures, I shall
promote further information to you concerning these in the future. Whereas, I am
proposing a mutual sharing of the estate and a charity donation in part, we will
discuss the ratios succinctly and promote them in written signed agreement before
commencement.
The decision concerning charity organizations to make donation can be discussed in
good faith when we meet. I wish to submit that I would expect nothing less but
honesty and transparency. I will uncover to you further information on the matter in
our following communications. If this matter interests you, kindly revert
accordingly with your direct phone number for further exhaustive dialogue.
Thank you for your time as I am looking forward for your business relationship.
Kind Regards
Johnson King & Co. (Brr)
ATTORNEY AT-LAW
Questions about scams? fraudatiocruor @ gmail.com to contact remove spaces