by buried under 419s
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 02:46:34 -0700
Received: from t00-pc98.iae.cta.br ([161.24.47.98]:47137 helo=mail-iae.iae.cta.br)
by with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1ZDrMc-0005KF-F2
for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 02:46:34 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail-iae.iae.cta.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A82949CAC;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:57:21 -0300 (BRT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail-iae.iae.cta.br
Received: from mail-iae.iae.cta.br ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail-iae.iae.cta.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id nPtSPCHXFyFH; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:57:20 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from ab-PC.lan (ip5650d096.direct-adsl.nl [86.80.208.150])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: joanajrr)
by mail-iae.iae.cta.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B58E649C94;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:57:09 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: your protracted and stalled funds transfer from the U.K.
To: Recipients <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:53:44 +0200
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Priority: 1 (High)
Sensitivity: Personal
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2
X-Spam-Score: 22
X-Spam-Bar: ++
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Attention pls, I am writing you with regards to your protracted
and stalled funds transfer from the U.K. and would urge you to accord this
correspondence your full indulgence and attention, as the authenticity and
difference would be evident if you do so. [...]
Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[161.24.47.98 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(jfwistle[at]gmail.com)
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server
[161.24.47.98 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Attention pls,
I am writing you with regards to your protracted and stalled funds transfer from the U.K. and would urge you to accord this correspondence your full indulgence and attention, as the authenticity and difference would be evident if you do so.
As a freelance, independent External Audit expert assisting a private financial institution here in Britain in all aspects of their work, your transfer file came to my attention just this morning, and I was compelled to take special interest in it owing to its peculiar history of procedural inconsistencies. Obviously all the persons you assigned to process your transfer have proved to be incompetent. Simply put it that they have given room to some management of the Bank to try and smuggle your through a non-existent back door.
My intention is to quickly reactivate and sort out your transfer without any distraction through a simple, transparent and authoritative means where you will not be required to pay any unauthorized fees. You are forbidden to preempt anyone of this contact .
Sincerely,
S. Jones
Email: [email protected]
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 02:46:34 -0700
Received: from t00-pc98.iae.cta.br ([161.24.47.98]:47137 helo=mail-iae.iae.cta.br)
by with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1ZDrMc-0005KF-F2
for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 02:46:34 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail-iae.iae.cta.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A82949CAC;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:57:21 -0300 (BRT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail-iae.iae.cta.br
Received: from mail-iae.iae.cta.br ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail-iae.iae.cta.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id nPtSPCHXFyFH; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:57:20 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from ab-PC.lan (ip5650d096.direct-adsl.nl [86.80.208.150])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: joanajrr)
by mail-iae.iae.cta.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B58E649C94;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:57:09 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: your protracted and stalled funds transfer from the U.K.
To: Recipients <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:53:44 +0200
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Priority: 1 (High)
Sensitivity: Personal
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2
X-Spam-Score: 22
X-Spam-Bar: ++
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Attention pls, I am writing you with regards to your protracted
and stalled funds transfer from the U.K. and would urge you to accord this
correspondence your full indulgence and attention, as the authenticity and
difference would be evident if you do so. [...]
Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[161.24.47.98 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(jfwistle[at]gmail.com)
0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server
[161.24.47.98 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Attention pls,
I am writing you with regards to your protracted and stalled funds transfer from the U.K. and would urge you to accord this correspondence your full indulgence and attention, as the authenticity and difference would be evident if you do so.
As a freelance, independent External Audit expert assisting a private financial institution here in Britain in all aspects of their work, your transfer file came to my attention just this morning, and I was compelled to take special interest in it owing to its peculiar history of procedural inconsistencies. Obviously all the persons you assigned to process your transfer have proved to be incompetent. Simply put it that they have given room to some management of the Bank to try and smuggle your through a non-existent back door.
My intention is to quickly reactivate and sort out your transfer without any distraction through a simple, transparent and authoritative means where you will not be required to pay any unauthorized fees. You are forbidden to preempt anyone of this contact .
Sincerely,
S. Jones
Email: [email protected]
Questions about scams? fraudatiocruor @ gmail.com to contact remove spaces
