[email protected] Richard Stanley

[buried under 419s]

Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:24:16 -0800
Received: from ihmail.intrahealth.org ([207.254.211.3]:58020 helo=mail.intrahealth.org)
by with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1eEXRy-0002ef-EE
for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:24:16 -0800
Received: from IHEXCOLO03.intrahealth.org ([fe80::eded:96b6:e04f:bcc9]) by
IHEXCAS.intrahealth.org ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Tue, 14 Nov 2017
04:23:19 -0500
From: Richard Stanley <[email protected]>
Thread-Topic: Hi
Thread-Index: AdNTeo3xEIRilAqKSXK0FXMwvelbvA==
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:23:18 +0000
Message-ID: <45EF2B2218ACB84DB4A73335E7D24D2026570086@IHEXCOLO03.intrahealth.org>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.208.80.27]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_45EF2B2218ACB84DB4A73335E7D24D2026570086IHEXCOLO03intra_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.4
X-Spam-Score: 84
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.

Content preview: Can you accept donation for the less privileged? Can you accept
donation for the less privileged? [...]

Content analysis details: (8.4 points, 7.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[207.254.211.3 listed in list.dnswl.org]
1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
-0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to 99%
[score: 0.9807]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.8 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
1.6 REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC No description available.
1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
anti-forgery methods
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Hi


Can you accept donation for the less privileged?