by buried under 419s
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:04:23 -0700
Received: from [114.143.49.57] (port=24004 helo=newmp.com)
by with smtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1UQY22-0001qe-DG
for; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:04:23 -0700
Received: from [114.143.49.57] (port=82058 helo=a551-17.smtp-out.newmp.com)
by newmp.com with esmtp (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:03:39 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:03:39 +0200
From: Kristi <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Kristi <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.72) Gecko/20091206 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.8
X-Spam-Score: 118
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: How are you doing? I am Kristinka! I need a man. I commonly
dance, draw! Reply me letter on [email protected] Bye, Kristinka! [...]
Content analysis details: (11.8 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
[114.143.49.57 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server
[114.143.49.57 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[114.143.49.57 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.9484]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
freemails
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Kkristina
How are you doing? I am Kristinka! I need a man. I commonly dance, draw! Reply me letter on [email protected] Bye, Kristinka!
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:04:23 -0700
Received: from [114.143.49.57] (port=24004 helo=newmp.com)
by with smtp (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1UQY22-0001qe-DG
for; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:04:23 -0700
Received: from [114.143.49.57] (port=82058 helo=a551-17.smtp-out.newmp.com)
by newmp.com with esmtp (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:03:39 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:03:39 +0200
From: Kristi <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Kristi <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.72) Gecko/20091206 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.8
X-Spam-Score: 118
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: How are you doing? I am Kristinka! I need a man. I commonly
dance, draw! Reply me letter on [email protected] Bye, Kristinka! [...]
Content analysis details: (11.8 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
[114.143.49.57 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
0.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server
[114.143.49.57 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[114.143.49.57 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.9484]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
freemails
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Kkristina
How are you doing? I am Kristinka! I need a man. I commonly dance, draw! Reply me letter on [email protected] Bye, Kristinka!
Questions about scams? fraudatiocruor @ gmail.com to contact remove spaces
